Summer League Spotlight: Prince-Mont Swim League

By Reach for the Wall Staff Writers.

This is another in a series of articles that highlight the summer swim leagues in our area that have played key roles in making the Washington D.C. metro area a national hotbed for swimming and helped produce Olympic gold medalists and a long line of scholarship athletes.  We previously highlighted the Montgomery County Swim League (MCSL) and the Northern Virginia Swimming League (NVSL), and now we focus on the Prince-Mont Swim League (PMSL).

The PMSL, formed in 1959, has 40 teams from Prince George’s County, Montgomery County, Charles County, Anne Arundel County, Howard County, Calvert County, and the District of Columbia and has approximately 5,000 swimmers.  The league is divided into 7 divisions, and the 5-6 teams in each division hold dual meets over 5 weeks. After that period, each team sends its 2 fastest swimmers in each event to compete in its division’s championship meet. Then, at the end of the season, the top swimmer in each event at each of the 7 divisional championship meets compete against each other at the All-Star Meet.

The champion team in each Division is determined by adding the total points awarded to each team from its won-lost dual meet record and from its standing in the Division meet.  That is, the team that has the best won-lost dual meet record receives 8 points (the 2nd place team wins 6 points, 3rd gets 4, etc.) and the team that came in 1st at the Divisionals meet is given 6 points (the 2nd place team gets 4 points, 3rd wins 3, etc.).  If there is a tie between the amount of total points that teams get, the tie goes to the winner of the dual meet between the two teams.

Below are some highlights of the top 3 divisions in the league. In several weeks, after team rosters are fixed, we will identify some PMSL swimmers that you might keep an eye on.

Division A

Theresa Banks, Kingfish Swim Club, Takoma Park D.C., Belair Bath & Tennis, Whitehall Pool & Tennis, Adelphi Recreation

Theresa BanksThe Theresa Banks Tiger Sharks have won 5 consecutive PMSL league titles and have not lost a dual meet since 2010.   The Takoma Park D.C. All Stars were the last team to beat the Tiger Sharks in a dual meet and to win a league title (both in 2010).  Takoma also came close to besting TB in 2012, when they beat the Tiger Sharks in Divisionals but their loss to TB in their dual meet was the difference in the final league standings.

The real battle in Division A since 2012 has been between Takoma Park and the Kingfish Swim Club.  Kingfish beat Takoma Park in their dual meets in 2015 and 2013 while Takoma Park won the head-to-head contests in 2014 and 2012.  The All Stars, however, have bested Kingfish in the last 3 Division A championship meets.  Is this Kingfish’s year to beat Takoma Park in both their dual meet and Divisionals?

Before the rise of Theresa Banks and Kingfish, Belair Bath and Tennis Club (BBT) battled Takoma Park for league crowns, winning their last league title in 2006.  Over the last three years, however, BBT has battled Whitehall Pool and Tennis Club (WPT) for 4th place in Division A.  WPT won last year’s dual meet by 4 points, so this year’s encounter should be fun to watch.

Adelphi Recreation, which won Division B last year, will be the only new team in Division A this year.  Adelphi last swam in Division A in 2014, where they came in 6th place.

Division B

Hawthorne Country Club, Kings Landing, MVP Dolphins, Pointer Ridge, Smallwood Village Aquatic, Strathmore Bel Pre

Despite falling to Division B this year, Smallwood Village Aquatic has been a team on the rise over the past several seasons.  The Marlins won Division D in 2013 and Division B in 2014 before peaking in Division A last year. On its way up, SVA beat both Mount Vernon Pool (MVP) and Strathmore Bel Pre (SBP) in 2014, so those two teams may be looking to get even with Smallwood this season.

The SBP Dolphins narrowly lost the Division B crown last year to Adelphi Recreation (despite beating AR in their dual meet), so many are picking Strathmore to win the division title this year.  However, Hawthorne Country Club (HCC), who beat Strathmore in their meeting last year but lost by 3 points to the Dolphins at Divisionals, will be looking to punish SBP for last year’s outrage.

But don’t sleep on Kings Landing.  The Lionfish, who rocketed up the divisional standings from Division G in lionfish.22010 to winning the Division B championship meet last year, are the darkhorse choice to win Division B this year.  HCC’s loss to Kings Landing last year in their dual meet is what allowed Strathmore to slip ahead of HCC in the 2015’s final divisional standings (despite SBP losing to HCC head-to-head).  HCC might have it out for Kings Landing this year.

The Pointer Ridge Porpoises and MVP Dolphins had a great battle last year for the Division C crown that came down to the wire.  PR beat MVP in their dual meet but MVP out-touched PR at Divisionals, meaning that the two teams tied in the final point standings.  But, the tie went to PR because they won the head-to-head match-up.  Look for MVP, who competed in Division B in 2013-2014 and in Division A up until 2012, to right that wrong this year.

Division C

Cheverly, Fort Washington, Greenbelt, Greenview, Roger Carter Seals, West Arundel

No team in this year’s Division C swam in Division C last year.  Two of Division C’s teams this year (Fort Washington and Greenbelt) swam in Division B last year and the other 4 teams competed in Divisions D and E last year.

Greenbelt has been a fixture in Division B for many years, so Division C will be novel for the Barracudas.  Last year, Fort Washington beat Greenbelt in both their dual meet and the Division B championship meet, so the Barracudas may look to even the score this year and climb back up to Division B next season.

Last season in their respective dual meets, West Arundel (WA) beat Roger Carter Seals (RCS) by 8 points, RCS beat Cheverly Swim & Raquet (CSR) by 19 points, and CSR beat WA, with all 3 teams finishing with a 4-1 record.  The Seals, however, won the Division D crown by winning Divisionals, and WA edged Cheverly for 2nd place in the division by outscoring CSR by 7.5 points at the championship meet.  Look for more fireworks between these 3 teams in their new Division C home.

Greenview is a team to watch this year, as it made a big leap to this year’s Division C from last year’s Division E.

Good luck to all PMSL teams this summer – swim fast and have fun! (And send us photos, videos and write-ups from your meets.)

8 thoughts on “Summer League Spotlight: Prince-Mont Swim League

  • Jun 13, 2016 at 11:40 am

    Awesome article! Thanks for covering the PMSL league.

  • Jun 14, 2016 at 3:24 am

    Most of these teams are not in the same geographic area, why would a team from Charles and Calvert county compete with a team in Montgomery county like Bel Pre?

    Is there a reason why Bel Pre is not part of MCSL? I wonder if past segregation laws have anything to do with it?

    • Jun 17, 2016 at 5:53 am

      According to the history posted on their website: “William Johnson, a former community member, provided the initial impetus for the creation of the swim team. Organizing youngsters from the community, Johnson and several other adults, most notably John Gallogly, put together a loose-knit bunch of swimmers who had a lot of talent. They called themselves the Dolphins, and they swam other organized teams in the area. In 1973, the team applied for and gained membership in the PMSL. The Dolphins were seeded last in “F” Division…the last of 36 teams in the League.”

      Further, “In 2001, the team seriously considered moving to the Montgomery County Swim League. After a season-long consideration, including a presentation by an MCSL representative, the team voted by a 2-1 majority to remain in the PMSL.”

  • Jun 16, 2016 at 2:15 pm

    It’s always great to read about the local swimmers. Their star shines as well!

  • Jun 16, 2016 at 4:09 pm

    Maybe there’s a logical reason but it’s unfortunate PMSL only spoke of the rivalries and accomplishments in divisions A, B and C and not the others. The other leagues included all of their divisions.

    • Jun 16, 2016 at 6:49 pm

      The PMSL article actually covers more teams in that league (18 of its 40 teams (or 45%)) than the number of teams that, say the NVSL article covers (36 of its 102 teams (or 35%)). Believe it or not, lots of research goes into each of these articles, so it’s quite time consuming to even cover the teams that were covered, much less every team in every league. If you provide us with analysis of any PMSL division we missed, we’ll publish it.

  • Jun 17, 2016 at 3:44 pm

    Really. Your comment appears defensive and maybe you misunderstood me but I’ll contend it’s not about percentages. They’re irrelevant. It’s about appearances, fairness and representing all of the swimmers in the league, not just the top three. Is it more work to include all the divisions? Absolutely. Should you have included them? Absolutely, otherwise you risk offending those not represented. I’m not accusing you of any wrong doing, and I don’t expect you to agree with me. Not everyone gets it. But if you wrote the articles for NVSL and MCSL, congratulations they were well balanced and you did a great job. However I strongly believe the PMSL article was well written but should have included the same reporting for all of our divisions.

    • Jun 17, 2016 at 7:20 pm

      Not defensive at all, we apologize if you took it that way. We are all swim parents ourselves covering these leagues to the best of our abilities. Our kids all swim in the MCSL so we know it well. We rely heavily on our readers to send us information about the different leagues. We definitely need help in the Prince-Mont Swim League. If you or anyone you know is interested please email us at

      We would love to have your league represented more and need the communities help!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *